FINANCIAL POST COLUMN: Some Canadians see their doctor a lot!

May 12, 2026

SecondStreet.org President Colin Craig writes in the Financial Post that Curtailing over use and abuse of the medical system could free up resources to help underserved Canadians.

Read the Column

If you’re like most Canadians, you often have trouble getting to see your family doctor. But some Canadians don’t have any trouble at all. Quebec government data indicate one patient saw their family doctor 362 times in 2024. You have to wonder: which three days didn’t they meet with their doctor? Christmas? Easter? The Super Bowl?

Patient confidentiality means we’ll probably never know what was going on. What is clear, however, is that all provincial governments should review cases of excessive doctor appointments more closely, for government data obtained by SecondStreet.org shows Quebec’s experience is not unique. No doubt most doctors and patients are completely ethical, but we should all be concerned when the system is abused. Over-use costs taxpayers and takes resources from those with legitimate needs.

Quebec’s super-patient isn’t a one-off. The province’s other “top 10” users ranged from 295 to 346 general-practitioner appointments that same year. Manitoba’s top patient had 252 appointments in a single year, while B.C. and Saskatchewan topped out at 209 and 199 visits, respectively. In Alberta, the government reports, 9,331 patients had 100 or more appointments in 2024. It has already promised to look into these numbers.

The big question is, of course: how many of the high-volume cases in each province are legitimate and how many involve either patients taking advantage of “free” health care or doctors abusing their ability to bill the system? The evidence suggests abuse is happening, it’s just a question of how much.

Late last year the Ontario government’s auditor noted that “one physician billed more than 24 hours of services on 98 days between May 2021 and April 2022. On one of these days, this physician billed 114 hours of services.” Who is this mysterious doctor who can bend time to squeeze in so many hours in a single day?

The report went on: “the Ministry’s post-payment audit found that the physician’s clinical records failed to show start and stop times for services provided. The Ministry identified almost $1.4 million in overpayments.” The same report also noted: “Another physician billed over 24 hours of services on 15 days within a six-month period in 2020-21.”

On the other hand, several social media posts about SecondStreet.org’s research allude to abuse by patients. For instance, one person on Facebook commented that at a clinic she worked at in Edmonton “there are patients that come in once a week to see this doctor. The doctor went on medical leave and they still come in once a week. And when u (sic) ask why they are there … they shrug and say they just come in every week to ‘check in.’”

All this is happening while an estimated six million patients do not have a family doctor. Curtailing over-use and abuse could free up resources to help these people.

Some have called for user fees to deter abuse by patients. A small fee almost certainly would lead to some patients being more judicious in how often they use the system. They might wait an extra day to see if a cold clears up before running to their family doctor’s office. Or those just “checking in” regularly for no reason might reconsider, as even a fee of $10 for each visit would add up over time.

User fees are a political non-starter, however. A 2025 poll commissioned by SecondStreet.org found that 59 per cent of Canadians oppose paying just $10 for an appointment. With the high cost of living the top political issue in the country and taxes to fund health care already high, politicians aren’t likely to implement such a change.

In terms of improving the system, however, Ontario’s auditor report includes straightforward solutions: use data analytics to flag when patients are piling up bills, audit those cases and then follow up to make sure the physicians involved change their behaviour. It also wouldn’t hurt if provinces like Alberta and Quebec that do have higher case volumes spoke with those like Saskatchewan that have far fewer cases of extreme use.

To repeat, most patients and doctors are almost certainly ethical when it comes to using and billing the system. But a nation of over 40 million people is bound to include some bad apples. For the sake of taxpayers and genuine patients who have trouble accessing the system, they need to be tracked down and rooted out.

Colin Craig is president of think tank SecondStreet.org.

This column was originally published in The Financial Post on May 12, 2026.

You can help us continue to research and tell stories about this issue by making a donation or sharing this content with your friends. Be sure to sign up for our updates too!

Share this Story

Help spread the message and make real change by sharing this story with your network.

Facebook
X
Email

How You Can Take Action

Whether you donate, speak up, or share our work, every action strengthens the push for better policies in health care, education, and everyday life. When Canadians get involved, leaders pay attention—and real reform becomes possible.

Related Stories

May 12, 2026
SecondStreet.org President Colin Craig writes in the Financial Post that Curtailing over use and abuse of the medical system could free up resources to help underserved Canadians.
April 29, 2026
New SecondStreet.org research shows that nearly a thousand Atlantic patients have seen a doctor 50+ times in a year.
April 28, 2026
New SecondStreet.org research shows that some Quebec patients are seeing doctors hundreds of times in a single year.

Join 20,000+ Canadians in our movement for a better Canada.

Name(Required)
Select Your Interests(Required)
Consent(Required)

Prevention – reduce demand in the first place

If Canadians lived healthier lives, we could reduce demand for emergency services, orthopaedic surgeries, primary care and more. 

For instance, if you visit the Canadian Cancer Society’s website, you’ll read that “about four in ten” cancer cases are preventable. The Heart and Stroke Foundation notes that “almost 80 percent of premature heart disease and stroke can be prevented through healthy behaviours.” A similar number of Diabetes cases are also preventable. 

Many joint replacements and visits to ERs and walk-in clinics could also be avoided through healthy living. 

To be sure, not all health problems can be avoided through healthy living – everyday the system treats Canadians with genetic conditions, helps those injured in unavoidable accidents and more.  

But there is an opportunity to reduce pressure on the health care system through Canadians shifting to healthier lifestyles – better diets, more exercise, etc. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this column. 

Partner with non-profits and for-profit clinics

European countries will partner with anyone who can help patients. 

It doesn’t matter if it’s a non-profit, a government entity or a private clinic. What matters is that patients receive quality treatment, in a timely manner and for a competitive price.  

In Canada, governments often delivery services using government-run hospitals instead of seeing if non-profit or private clinics could deliver the services more effectively. 

When governments have partnered with non-profit and private clinics, the results have often been quite good – Saskatchewan, Ontario and British Columbia are just a few examples of where partnerships have worked well. 

Canada should pursue more of these partnerships to reduce wait times and increase the volume of services provided to patients.  

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see the links above. 

Make cross border care more accessible

In Canada, citizens pay high taxes each year and we’re promised universal health care services in return. The problem is, wait times are often extremely long in our health system – sometimes patients have to wait years to see a specialist or receive surgery. 

If patients don’t want to wait long periods, they often have to reach into their own pocket and pay for treatment outside the province or country. 

Throughout the European Union, we also find universal health care systems. But a key difference is that EU patients have the right to go to other EU countries, pay for surgery and then be reimbursed by their home government. Reimbursements cover up to what the patient’s home government would have spent to provide the treatment locally. 

If Canada copied this approach, a patient waiting a year to get their hip operation could instead receive treatment next week in one of thousands of surgical clinics throughout the developed world. 

Governments benefit too as the patient is now back on their feet and avoiding complications that sometimes come with long wait times – meaning the government doesn’t have to treat those complications on top of the initial health problem. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or this shorter video. 

Legalize access to non-government providers

Canada is the only country in the world that puts up barriers, or outright bans patients from paying for health services locally. 

For instance, a patient in Toronto cannot pay for a hip operation at a private clinic in Toronto. Their only option is to wait for the government to eventually provide treatment or leave the province and pay elsewhere. 

Countries with better-performing universal health care systems do not have such bans. They allow patients a choice – use the public system or pay privately for treatment. Sweden, France, Australia and more – they all allow choice. 

Why? One reason is that allowing choice means some patients will decide to pay privately. This takes pressure off the public system. For instance, in Sweden, 87% of patients use the public system, but 13% purchase private health insurance. 

Ultimately, more choice improves access for patients. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or watch this short clip on this topic. 

Shift to funding services for patients, not bureaucracies

In Canada, most hospitals receive a cheque from the government each year and are then asked to do their best to help patients. This approach is known as “block funding”. 

Under this model, a patient walking in the door represents a drain on the hospital’s budget. Over the course of a year, hospital administrators have to make sure the budget stretches out so services are rationed. This is why you might have to wait until next year or the year after for a hip operation, knee operation, etc. 

In better-performing universal health systems, they take the opposite approach – hospitals receive money from the government each time they help a patient. If a hospital completes a knee operation, it might receive, say, $10,000. If it completes a knee operation on another patient, it receives another $10,000. 

This model incentivizes hospitals to help more patients – to help more patients with knee operations, cataract surgery, etc. This approach also incentivizes hospitals to spend money on expenses that help patients (e.g. more doctors, nurses, equipment, etc.) rather than using the money on expenses that don’t help patients (e.g. more admin staff). 

To learn more about this policy option, please watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this post by MEI.