REGINA LEADER-POST COLUMN: Saskatchewan must ponder bold private health care solutions

The dust has settled on the most recent provincial election, and the Saskatchewan Party will govern the province for at least four more years. Premier Moe has a lot on his plate, but fixing the broken health-care system should be at the top of his to-do list.

Luckily, he and his party have already laid down a fair bit of groundwork and made some solid progress. But there’s much work to be done. Fortunately, the government isn’t on its own — it could easily copy what has already been proven to work in other parts of the world.

Wait times in Saskatchewan have much room for improvement. The latest average surgical wait was over 31 weeks. It’s important to note that this figure doesn’t include waiting for diagnostics or specialists, so it’s likely even longer for the average patient.

This issue matters deeply to the people of our province. A poll released by CUPE ahead of the election showed 46 per cent of respondents with health care as their top concern. So what needs to be done?

One tactic the Saskatchewan Party has been happy to use has been contracting publicly funded, privately delivered surgeries. In its election platform, they boast that this model has delivered 165,000 surgeries since 2011.

The numbers back this tactic up. Coming out of the pandemic, Saskatchewan is the only province (that provided data) to have seen a drop in the number of patients waiting for surgery and diagnostics. This is good stuff. But why stop there?

There’s a unique opportunity for Saskatchewan, as it did in the days of Tommy Douglas, to lead in transforming Canada’s health-care system. For one, why not follow the lead of every other developed country with a universal system and allow patients to pay for surgery if they want to?

An online poll commissioned by Second Street and conducted in October showed 61 per cent of Canadian respondents support keeping the public system, but allowing private options.

And why wouldn’t they? Canada is in a unique club — North Korea and Cuba are the only two other countries in the world with strict, sweeping bans on private health care. France, Australia, Germany are all countries with better health outcomes that allow patients to pay for care.

Of course, taking this bold step would likely lead to a political showdown with the federal government over the Canada Health Act. But this isn’t something Moe has shied away from in the past — just look at his persistent fight against the carbon tax.

In fact, Moe could simply say that Saskatchewan patients should have the same rights as Quebec patients — the latter being the only province that allows patients to pay for surgery.

Another huge step would be to make cross-border care more accessible. In the European Union, patients have the right to travel to another EU country, pay for care, then be reimbursed for up to what it would have cost to do the surgery locally.

This helps give access to countless options for patients on waitlists, and also helps reduce pressure on the system at home. It’s pretty much cost-neutral, as you’re simply paying for the surgery earlier rather than later.

The above-mentioned poll showed a massive 73 per cent of Canadian respondents in favour of this policy.

And that’s not all. The world is full of great health-care policies that are more creative than simply throwing money at the problem. Take Ireland’s Cataract Express Bus.

They load up a bunch of patients on a bus and drive them to the United Kingdom to get cataract surgery. Instead of waiting years, they can get surgery within a couple of weeks.

There are clinics that can do these surgeries in Minot, ND — why not try loading up a bus in Estevan and slashing the cataract waitlist in an afternoon?

There is no perfect, one-size-fits-all fix to the Canadian health-care crisis, but Saskatchewan could use these and many other bold reform options to make real progress.

Dom Lucyk is the communications director with SecondStreet.org, a Canadian think tank.

This column was originally published in the Regina Leader-Post on November 29, 2024.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

You can help us continue to research and tell stories about this issue by making a donation or sharing this content with your friends. Be sure to sign up for our updates too!

Prevention – reduce demand in the first place

If Canadians lived healthier lives, we could reduce demand for emergency services, orthopaedic surgeries, primary care and more. 

For instance, if you visit the Canadian Cancer Society’s website, you’ll read that “about four in ten” cancer cases are preventable. The Heart and Stroke Foundation notes that “almost 80 percent of premature heart disease and stroke can be prevented through healthy behaviours.” A similar number of Diabetes cases are also preventable. 

Many joint replacements and visits to ERs and walk-in clinics could also be avoided through healthy living. 

To be sure, not all health problems can be avoided through healthy living – everyday the system treats Canadians with genetic conditions, helps those injured in unavoidable accidents and more.  

But there is an opportunity to reduce pressure on the health care system through Canadians shifting to healthier lifestyles – better diets, more exercise, etc. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this column. 

Partner with non-profits and for-profit clinics

European countries will partner with anyone who can help patients. 

It doesn’t matter if it’s a non-profit, a government entity or a private clinic. What matters is that patients receive quality treatment, in a timely manner and for a competitive price.  

In Canada, governments often delivery services using government-run hospitals instead of seeing if non-profit or private clinics could deliver the services more effectively. 

When governments have partnered with non-profit and private clinics, the results have often been quite good – Saskatchewan, Ontario and British Columbia are just a few examples of where partnerships have worked well. 

Canada should pursue more of these partnerships to reduce wait times and increase the volume of services provided to patients.  

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see the links above. 

Make cross border care more accessible

In Canada, citizens pay high taxes each year and we’re promised universal health care services in return. The problem is, wait times are often extremely long in our health system – sometimes patients have to wait years to see a specialist or receive surgery. 

If patients don’t want to wait long periods, they often have to reach into their own pocket and pay for treatment outside the province or country. 

Throughout the European Union, we also find universal health care systems. But a key difference is that EU patients have the right to go to other EU countries, pay for surgery and then be reimbursed by their home government. Reimbursements cover up to what the patient’s home government would have spent to provide the treatment locally. 

If Canada copied this approach, a patient waiting a year to get their hip operation could instead receive treatment next week in one of thousands of surgical clinics throughout the developed world. 

Governments benefit too as the patient is now back on their feet and avoiding complications that sometimes come with long wait times – meaning the government doesn’t have to treat those complications on top of the initial health problem. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or this shorter video. 

Legalize access to non-government providers

Canada is the only country in the world that puts up barriers, or outright bans patients from paying for health services locally. 

For instance, a patient in Toronto cannot pay for a hip operation at a private clinic in Toronto. Their only option is to wait for the government to eventually provide treatment or leave the province and pay elsewhere. 

Countries with better-performing universal health care systems do not have such bans. They allow patients a choice – use the public system or pay privately for treatment. Sweden, France, Australia and more – they all allow choice. 

Why? One reason is that allowing choice means some patients will decide to pay privately. This takes pressure off the public system. For instance, in Sweden, 87% of patients use the public system, but 13% purchase private health insurance. 

Ultimately, more choice improves access for patients. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or watch this short clip on this topic. 

Shift to funding services for patients, not bureaucracies

In Canada, most hospitals receive a cheque from the government each year and are then asked to do their best to help patients. This approach is known as “block funding”. 

Under this model, a patient walking in the door represents a drain on the hospital’s budget. Over the course of a year, hospital administrators have to make sure the budget stretches out so services are rationed. This is why you might have to wait until next year or the year after for a hip operation, knee operation, etc. 

In better-performing universal health systems, they take the opposite approach – hospitals receive money from the government each time they help a patient. If a hospital completes a knee operation, it might receive, say, $10,000. If it completes a knee operation on another patient, it receives another $10,000. 

This model incentivizes hospitals to help more patients – to help more patients with knee operations, cataract surgery, etc. This approach also incentivizes hospitals to spend money on expenses that help patients (e.g. more doctors, nurses, equipment, etc.) rather than using the money on expenses that don’t help patients (e.g. more admin staff). 

To learn more about this policy option, please watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this post by MEI.