WESTERN STANDARD COLUMN: Canadians think the kids aren’t alright, and governments must act

Canadians pay a lot of taxes. Federal sales tax, provincial sales tax, income tax, carbon tax, you name it. But what value are we getting for all of those dollars that end up in the government’s pockets? 

When it comes to the K-12 public education system, Canadians believe the system has gone in the wrong direction.

new poll from SecondStreet.org shows that Canadians are not happy with the direction of the public school system. We hired Leger to ask Canadians if they think the K-12 system has gone in the right or wrong direction over the past 20 years. Over half said ‘wrong direction,’ while only 25 per cent said ‘right direction.’ 

This number has been steadily going up since we first asked the question in 2020 — at that time, only 32 per cent thought the system had gone in the wrong direction.

Given that governments nationwide spend over $7 billion per year on education, it doesn’t seem like Canadians feel they’re getting value for that money.

Imagine you were a family planning to buy a new house. If 55 per cent of the consultants you asked thought the house was built on a crumbling, mouldy foundation — would you still buy it?

So what exactly is going wrong in the K-12 school system?

When asked about the K-12 system, Canadians fingered four aspects particularly that were going in the “wrong direction” than the “right direction.” 

  • When it came to students, respondents were most concerned about “discipline and accountability in schools.” Parents feel like children are allowed to fool around and not worry about doing their work, as there won’t be any real consequences.

    Nobody wants to bring back the days of the strap, but people clearly think kids are getting off too easily.

  • Many respondents raised concerns about children no longer failing subjects, despite not knowing the material. It’s a fair enough concern — when you have a job as an adult, you can’t just show up late every day and never complete your work. You’ll get fired.

    So why not teach kids this important lesson early on?

  • Another big concern was a lack of focus on practical skills, and schools’ priorities on what is taught. One respondent said that “my kids are incapable of doing basic math without a calculator.” This isn’t surprising, as test scores have been steadily dropping over the past 20 years. When kids are in school, they should be learning.

  • Of course, many are concerned about controversial content on sex and gender education. You can look at any number of stories to see why: how about the Saskatchewan school where kids were handed cards describing graphic sex acts, or the male shop teacher who wore massive fake breasts in an Ontario school? It’s easy to see why parents might not want their children exposed to this kind of environment.

So, here’s some homework for provincial governments: pay attention to what Canadians are telling you. 

Canadians have footed the bill for public education and it’s coming up short. So, look at how you can improve discipline and accountability of students, the content that is taught, and the many other issues people are concerned about. Canadians clearly want something different. 

Improving the public system is a great goal, but it doesn’t have to stop there. Some parents simply won’t feel comfortable with their kids in the public school system. Governments should look at what can be done to support those who prefer to have their children educated outside of the public system — charter and independent schools, as well as looking at ways to make homeschooling and other alternatives more accessible. 

Leaving things as is simply won’t work. So let’s get down to the business of making schools better for Canadian kids. 

Dom Lucyk is the Communications Director for SecondStreet.org, a Canadian think tank.

This column was originally published in The Western Standard on June 12, 2024.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

You can help us continue to research and tell stories about this issue by making a donation or sharing this content with your friends. Be sure to sign up for our updates too!

Prevention – reduce demand in the first place

If Canadians lived healthier lives, we could reduce demand for emergency services, orthopaedic surgeries, primary care and more. 

For instance, if you visit the Canadian Cancer Society’s website, you’ll read that “about four in ten” cancer cases are preventable. The Heart and Stroke Foundation notes that “almost 80 percent of premature heart disease and stroke can be prevented through healthy behaviours.” A similar number of Diabetes cases are also preventable. 

Many joint replacements and visits to ERs and walk-in clinics could also be avoided through healthy living. 

To be sure, not all health problems can be avoided through healthy living – everyday the system treats Canadians with genetic conditions, helps those injured in unavoidable accidents and more.  

But there is an opportunity to reduce pressure on the health care system through Canadians shifting to healthier lifestyles – better diets, more exercise, etc. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this column. 

Partner with non-profits and for-profit clinics

European countries will partner with anyone who can help patients. 

It doesn’t matter if it’s a non-profit, a government entity or a private clinic. What matters is that patients receive quality treatment, in a timely manner and for a competitive price.  

In Canada, governments often delivery services using government-run hospitals instead of seeing if non-profit or private clinics could deliver the services more effectively. 

When governments have partnered with non-profit and private clinics, the results have often been quite good – Saskatchewan, Ontario and British Columbia are just a few examples of where partnerships have worked well. 

Canada should pursue more of these partnerships to reduce wait times and increase the volume of services provided to patients.  

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see the links above. 

Make cross border care more accessible

In Canada, citizens pay high taxes each year and we’re promised universal health care services in return. The problem is, wait times are often extremely long in our health system – sometimes patients have to wait years to see a specialist or receive surgery. 

If patients don’t want to wait long periods, they often have to reach into their own pocket and pay for treatment outside the province or country. 

Throughout the European Union, we also find universal health care systems. But a key difference is that EU patients have the right to go to other EU countries, pay for surgery and then be reimbursed by their home government. Reimbursements cover up to what the patient’s home government would have spent to provide the treatment locally. 

If Canada copied this approach, a patient waiting a year to get their hip operation could instead receive treatment next week in one of thousands of surgical clinics throughout the developed world. 

Governments benefit too as the patient is now back on their feet and avoiding complications that sometimes come with long wait times – meaning the government doesn’t have to treat those complications on top of the initial health problem. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or this shorter video. 

Legalize access to non-government providers

Canada is the only country in the world that puts up barriers, or outright bans patients from paying for health services locally. 

For instance, a patient in Toronto cannot pay for a hip operation at a private clinic in Toronto. Their only option is to wait for the government to eventually provide treatment or leave the province and pay elsewhere. 

Countries with better-performing universal health care systems do not have such bans. They allow patients a choice – use the public system or pay privately for treatment. Sweden, France, Australia and more – they all allow choice. 

Why? One reason is that allowing choice means some patients will decide to pay privately. This takes pressure off the public system. For instance, in Sweden, 87% of patients use the public system, but 13% purchase private health insurance. 

Ultimately, more choice improves access for patients. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or watch this short clip on this topic. 

Shift to funding services for patients, not bureaucracies

In Canada, most hospitals receive a cheque from the government each year and are then asked to do their best to help patients. This approach is known as “block funding”. 

Under this model, a patient walking in the door represents a drain on the hospital’s budget. Over the course of a year, hospital administrators have to make sure the budget stretches out so services are rationed. This is why you might have to wait until next year or the year after for a hip operation, knee operation, etc. 

In better-performing universal health systems, they take the opposite approach – hospitals receive money from the government each time they help a patient. If a hospital completes a knee operation, it might receive, say, $10,000. If it completes a knee operation on another patient, it receives another $10,000. 

This model incentivizes hospitals to help more patients – to help more patients with knee operations, cataract surgery, etc. This approach also incentivizes hospitals to spend money on expenses that help patients (e.g. more doctors, nurses, equipment, etc.) rather than using the money on expenses that don’t help patients (e.g. more admin staff). 

To learn more about this policy option, please watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this post by MEI.