EPOCH TIMES COLUMN: Communist-Style Surveillance and Stalking Have No Place in Canada

In a communist country, you can never be quite sure who is listening to you and what might happen if you say the wrong thing to the wrong person.

Should Canadians have to suffer from the same indecision, anxiety, and worry?

Chinese-Canadians, Hong Kongers, Tibetans, Uyghurs, and more who dare to speak out against the oppressive Chinese Communist Party are, sadly, in that same conundrum—even when they’ve made it to a safer, freer country.

It’s not a newly uncovered fact that dissidents against the CCP fall into the Xi regime’s crosshairs, even abroad. Just think about Conservative MP Michael Chong, whose electoral campaign was targeted by Chinese disinformation. This isn’t a one-party issue, either; the NDP’s Jenny Kwan has been similarly targeted.

But it’s not just politicians. There is evidence that everyday people who don’t support the CCP are being harassed.

 One media outlet reported that a burly Chinese man filmed pro-Hong Kong protesters from a distance during a demonstration in favour of democracy in Vancouver. Cherie Wong, a pro-Hong Kong activist from Toronto, told CTV she’s received threatening phone calls in the middle of the night. Turnisa Matsedik-Qira, a Uyghur Canadian activist in Vancouver, told Global News she’s been spat on by CCP loyalists, received threatening phone calls, and had her children threatened. As far back as 2001, practitioners of the Falun Gong spiritual group in Calgary said they had been targeted.

None of this should be surprising. It’s in the name: the Chinese Communist Party. When have communist and socialist countries ever had a track record of respecting human rights and peacefully allowing dissent?

Stalin’s Russia, Castro’s Cuba, Kim’s Korea. We rightfully look back on those regimes in disgust, where millions were slaughtered or thrown in prison camps, starved to death, tortured, forced to inform on their families, and more.

The Chinese regime is no different. Sure, they’ve made some economic reforms and the average Chinese citizen is less likely to starve to death now than 40 years ago. But the socialist-style surveillance and persecution of citizens is far from gone.

Chinese Canadians who have made their way to a better country shouldn’t have to worry about the regime punishing them for speaking their minds.

So what can be done about it?

There are a number of potential steps raised by policy experts, politicians, and activists. One is to create a registry of foreign agents in collaboration with other western democracies. Another is to investigate any links the CCP may have to Chinese-language media in Canada.

These are good ideas, and there are surely many more on the policy side that could help the situation. But on the cultural side of things, it’s important to make sure people are aware of what’s going on. To quote Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, author of “The Gulag Archipelago” (one of the most comprehensive accounts of the horrors of life in socialist Russia):

“Thus many were shot ‒ thousands at first, then hundreds of thousands. We divide, we multiply, we sigh, we curse. But still and all, these are just numbers. They overwhelm the mind and then are easily forgotten. And if someday the relatives of those who had been shot were to send one publisher photographs of their executed kin … then just by leafing through them and looking into the extinguished eyes we would learn much that would be valuable for the rest of our lives.”

With that in mind, SecondStreet.org is hoping to compile stories from Chinese Canadians, Uyghur Canadians, Falun Gong practitioners, Hong Kong Canadians, and anyone else who’s been targeted by the CCP for an upcoming report. (If you have been targeted and are interested in filling out our anonymous survey, please contact me via email at dominick@secondstreet.org.)

Not only can spreading awareness like this help draw attention to the plight of those targeted by the CCP, but it can also help Canadians see the dangers of socialism.

There’s a phrase you’ll often hear: “Socialism is a great idea in theory, but it doesn’t seem to work out in practice.”

It’s hard to believe any great idea could lead to millions of deaths, labour camps, and mass starvation. Activists will often point to socialism as some utopian idea that leads to everyone holding hands, singing “Kumbaya,” and getting along just fine, but the reality never seems to work out that way.

Simply look at where it’s been tried. Do you want Canada to look like the Soviet Union of the 1940s? Or even modern-day China? If not, then it’s a good idea to take threats like the CCP and its underlying ideology seriously.

Dom Lucyk is the Communications Director with SecondStreet.org, a Canadian think tank.

This column was originally published in The Epoch Times on May 25, 2024.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

You can help us continue to research and tell stories about this issue by making a donation or sharing this content with your friends. Be sure to sign up for our updates too!

Prevention – reduce demand in the first place

If Canadians lived healthier lives, we could reduce demand for emergency services, orthopaedic surgeries, primary care and more. 

For instance, if you visit the Canadian Cancer Society’s website, you’ll read that “about four in ten” cancer cases are preventable. The Heart and Stroke Foundation notes that “almost 80 percent of premature heart disease and stroke can be prevented through healthy behaviours.” A similar number of Diabetes cases are also preventable. 

Many joint replacements and visits to ERs and walk-in clinics could also be avoided through healthy living. 

To be sure, not all health problems can be avoided through healthy living – everyday the system treats Canadians with genetic conditions, helps those injured in unavoidable accidents and more.  

But there is an opportunity to reduce pressure on the health care system through Canadians shifting to healthier lifestyles – better diets, more exercise, etc. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this column. 

Partner with non-profits and for-profit clinics

European countries will partner with anyone who can help patients. 

It doesn’t matter if it’s a non-profit, a government entity or a private clinic. What matters is that patients receive quality treatment, in a timely manner and for a competitive price.  

In Canada, governments often delivery services using government-run hospitals instead of seeing if non-profit or private clinics could deliver the services more effectively. 

When governments have partnered with non-profit and private clinics, the results have often been quite good – Saskatchewan, Ontario and British Columbia are just a few examples of where partnerships have worked well. 

Canada should pursue more of these partnerships to reduce wait times and increase the volume of services provided to patients.  

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see the links above. 

Make cross border care more accessible

In Canada, citizens pay high taxes each year and we’re promised universal health care services in return. The problem is, wait times are often extremely long in our health system – sometimes patients have to wait years to see a specialist or receive surgery. 

If patients don’t want to wait long periods, they often have to reach into their own pocket and pay for treatment outside the province or country. 

Throughout the European Union, we also find universal health care systems. But a key difference is that EU patients have the right to go to other EU countries, pay for surgery and then be reimbursed by their home government. Reimbursements cover up to what the patient’s home government would have spent to provide the treatment locally. 

If Canada copied this approach, a patient waiting a year to get their hip operation could instead receive treatment next week in one of thousands of surgical clinics throughout the developed world. 

Governments benefit too as the patient is now back on their feet and avoiding complications that sometimes come with long wait times – meaning the government doesn’t have to treat those complications on top of the initial health problem. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or this shorter video. 

Legalize access to non-government providers

Canada is the only country in the world that puts up barriers, or outright bans patients from paying for health services locally. 

For instance, a patient in Toronto cannot pay for a hip operation at a private clinic in Toronto. Their only option is to wait for the government to eventually provide treatment or leave the province and pay elsewhere. 

Countries with better-performing universal health care systems do not have such bans. They allow patients a choice – use the public system or pay privately for treatment. Sweden, France, Australia and more – they all allow choice. 

Why? One reason is that allowing choice means some patients will decide to pay privately. This takes pressure off the public system. For instance, in Sweden, 87% of patients use the public system, but 13% purchase private health insurance. 

Ultimately, more choice improves access for patients. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or watch this short clip on this topic. 

Shift to funding services for patients, not bureaucracies

In Canada, most hospitals receive a cheque from the government each year and are then asked to do their best to help patients. This approach is known as “block funding”. 

Under this model, a patient walking in the door represents a drain on the hospital’s budget. Over the course of a year, hospital administrators have to make sure the budget stretches out so services are rationed. This is why you might have to wait until next year or the year after for a hip operation, knee operation, etc. 

In better-performing universal health systems, they take the opposite approach – hospitals receive money from the government each time they help a patient. If a hospital completes a knee operation, it might receive, say, $10,000. If it completes a knee operation on another patient, it receives another $10,000. 

This model incentivizes hospitals to help more patients – to help more patients with knee operations, cataract surgery, etc. This approach also incentivizes hospitals to spend money on expenses that help patients (e.g. more doctors, nurses, equipment, etc.) rather than using the money on expenses that don’t help patients (e.g. more admin staff). 

To learn more about this policy option, please watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this post by MEI.