FINANCIAL POST COLUMN – The health care workers we need live here but work in the U.S.

Imagine you’re in a hospital delivery room welcoming your newborn into the world. As joy fills your heart you notice a strange figure at the back of the room. You focus in and see the hospital’s janitor taking off a mask and scrubs. He catches your glare and mouths the words “doctor shortage.”

Canada’s health-care system is not quite at that level of desperation, but elected officials routinely talk about the nation’s shortage of health workers — usually as part of discussions about training more doctors and recruiting more staff from abroad.

Those approaches can be helpful, but new SecondStreet.org research shows two other measures are worth considering: recruit Canadian health workers who live in Canada but commute to the U.S. for work, and spend more time convincing current staff not to leave in the first place.

Data we’ve collected shows U.S. border states have issued nurse and physician licences to 9,788 health-care workers with Canadian mailing addresses. That’s roughly half an NHL-sized arena full of staff.

To be sure, just because a health worker has a licence in the U.S. does not mean he or she actually commutes across the border for work every day. On the other hand, earlier this year SecondStreet.org conducted a detailed survey of Ontario nurses who currently have Michigan licences. We found that approximately two-thirds of those who live in Canada do commute to the U.S., while another eight per cent are hoping to work in the U.S. in the future.

It’s important to note this research only involved data from border states. California, Florida, Texas and other appealing states deeper in the United States have also attracted thousands of Canadian health-care workers. According to the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools, a U.S. body that confirms education credentials, it certified 2,550 Canadian nurses to work in the U.S. last year alone.

You might think “better compensation” would be the main reason Canadian staff work in the U.S., but the Ontario survey found that “availability of work” was actually the most common reason.

Angela Henry, a nurse who lives in Canada but works in Detroit, told SecondStreet.org that after moving to Windsor she could only find part-time nursing work. So she chose to work instead at a Detroit hospital that offered her both full-time work and greater control over her schedule.

Cheryl Cascio, another Canadian nurse who works in Detroit, echoed these comments. She told SecondStreet.org she doesn’t want to work multiple nursing jobs just to earn a full-time salary. Her U.S. employer was able to provide her with a stable schedule rather than the volatility that comes with chasing shifts in Ontario. Moreover, full-time work comes with benefits.

Better compensation was the second most common reason nurses gave for working in the United States. Better working conditions came third. Some survey respondents even raised concerns about working in unionized environments (including ranking low in terms of seniority if they returned to work in Canada) and the lower level of health-care technology in Canada. None of this reflects well on Canada’s health-care system.

There are a couple of important takeaways from this research.

First, government-run health-care facilities could try recruiting Canadian health-care workers who commute to the U.S. for work. In some cases, this may require a new approach to respond more effectively to the kinds of working conditions people are seeking. Perhaps nurses’ unions could be more flexible on seniority and other work rules if this would help hospitals ensure they have enough staff to serve patients.

Second, more and more provincial governments are partnering with private clinics to provide health services to patients in the public system. This is a positive development for health-care workers as it gives them more choice in terms of where to work. In addition, private clinics may be more responsive to the better working conditions doctors and nurses are seeking.

One thing is certain. Part of solving Canada’s health-care shortage is right under our nose. If governments don’t seize this opportunity, perhaps private clinics will.

Colin Craig is president of SecondStreet.org, a think-tank.

This column was published in the Financial Post on August 16, 2023.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

You can help us continue to research and tell stories about this issue by making a donation or sharing this content with your friends. Be sure to sign up for our updates too!

Prevention – reduce demand in the first place

If Canadians lived healthier lives, we could reduce demand for emergency services, orthopaedic surgeries, primary care and more. 

For instance, if you visit the Canadian Cancer Society’s website, you’ll read that “about four in ten” cancer cases are preventable. The Heart and Stroke Foundation notes that “almost 80 percent of premature heart disease and stroke can be prevented through healthy behaviours.” A similar number of Diabetes cases are also preventable. 

Many joint replacements and visits to ERs and walk-in clinics could also be avoided through healthy living. 

To be sure, not all health problems can be avoided through healthy living – everyday the system treats Canadians with genetic conditions, helps those injured in unavoidable accidents and more.  

But there is an opportunity to reduce pressure on the health care system through Canadians shifting to healthier lifestyles – better diets, more exercise, etc. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this column. 

Partner with non-profits and for-profit clinics

European countries will partner with anyone who can help patients. 

It doesn’t matter if it’s a non-profit, a government entity or a private clinic. What matters is that patients receive quality treatment, in a timely manner and for a competitive price.  

In Canada, governments often delivery services using government-run hospitals instead of seeing if non-profit or private clinics could deliver the services more effectively. 

When governments have partnered with non-profit and private clinics, the results have often been quite good – Saskatchewan, Ontario and British Columbia are just a few examples of where partnerships have worked well. 

Canada should pursue more of these partnerships to reduce wait times and increase the volume of services provided to patients.  

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see the links above. 

Make cross border care more accessible

In Canada, citizens pay high taxes each year and we’re promised universal health care services in return. The problem is, wait times are often extremely long in our health system – sometimes patients have to wait years to see a specialist or receive surgery. 

If patients don’t want to wait long periods, they often have to reach into their own pocket and pay for treatment outside the province or country. 

Throughout the European Union, we also find universal health care systems. But a key difference is that EU patients have the right to go to other EU countries, pay for surgery and then be reimbursed by their home government. Reimbursements cover up to what the patient’s home government would have spent to provide the treatment locally. 

If Canada copied this approach, a patient waiting a year to get their hip operation could instead receive treatment next week in one of thousands of surgical clinics throughout the developed world. 

Governments benefit too as the patient is now back on their feet and avoiding complications that sometimes come with long wait times – meaning the government doesn’t have to treat those complications on top of the initial health problem. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or this shorter video. 

Legalize access to non-government providers

Canada is the only country in the world that puts up barriers, or outright bans patients from paying for health services locally. 

For instance, a patient in Toronto cannot pay for a hip operation at a private clinic in Toronto. Their only option is to wait for the government to eventually provide treatment or leave the province and pay elsewhere. 

Countries with better-performing universal health care systems do not have such bans. They allow patients a choice – use the public system or pay privately for treatment. Sweden, France, Australia and more – they all allow choice. 

Why? One reason is that allowing choice means some patients will decide to pay privately. This takes pressure off the public system. For instance, in Sweden, 87% of patients use the public system, but 13% purchase private health insurance. 

Ultimately, more choice improves access for patients. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or watch this short clip on this topic. 

Shift to funding services for patients, not bureaucracies

In Canada, most hospitals receive a cheque from the government each year and are then asked to do their best to help patients. This approach is known as “block funding”. 

Under this model, a patient walking in the door represents a drain on the hospital’s budget. Over the course of a year, hospital administrators have to make sure the budget stretches out so services are rationed. This is why you might have to wait until next year or the year after for a hip operation, knee operation, etc. 

In better-performing universal health systems, they take the opposite approach – hospitals receive money from the government each time they help a patient. If a hospital completes a knee operation, it might receive, say, $10,000. If it completes a knee operation on another patient, it receives another $10,000. 

This model incentivizes hospitals to help more patients – to help more patients with knee operations, cataract surgery, etc. This approach also incentivizes hospitals to spend money on expenses that help patients (e.g. more doctors, nurses, equipment, etc.) rather than using the money on expenses that don’t help patients (e.g. more admin staff). 

To learn more about this policy option, please watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this post by MEI.