TRUE NORTH COLUMN – School choice a refuge for parents fed up with public system

Canadians live in a vast, diverse country with a wide set of values and opinions. 

So, it shouldn’t be surprising that many are upset with what’s being taught in public schools and other school activities.

Consider that a recent poll commissioned by SecondStreet.org found that 51% of Canadians think the public school system has gone in the wrong direction over the last 20 years. This is a significant increase – in late 2020, that number stood at just 32%.

Why are people so unhappy with the system?

Well, the poll didn’t delve into what’s driving these concerns, but if one follows what’s been going on in Canada’s public schools, it’s not hard to see why.

There are countless examples of sensitive, controversial, and politically-charged topics being taught to children across Canada as undisputed facts. 

Take for instance, the Calgary school that taught kids that saying “All Lives Matter” is inappropriate, or that climate activist Greta Thunberg and Michelle Obama are “great speakers.” No matter your opinion on those individuals or that statement, it’s clear that politically biased content was taught to children. Imagine how left-leaning parents would react if their child was taught that Jordan Peterson or Ben Shapiro were “great speakers.”

Also consider gender issues and sexual matters in public schools. 

By now, you’ve probably seen the photos of the teacher wearing enormous fake breasts at a school in Oakville, Ontario. In Lumsden, Saskatchewan, grade 9 students were handed cards explaining graphic sexual acts. In Castlegar, British Columbia, a teacher had a drag queen read to her elementary school class through Zoom. These are just a few examples of controversial activities in public schools as of late.

Many schools are also training their teachers to have an explicit bias against white people. Take, for instance, the Toronto District School Board. Last year, it held a workshop for teachers titled ‘Teaching math while White: An abolitionist approach to dismantling racism in the math classroom.’ Should critical race theory really play a part in teaching kids algebra?

With all of this focus on pushing controversial topics, it seems that a focus on math, reading, writing, history, and other important topics has fallen by the wayside. Test scores are dropping. 

Any or all of these reasons may be contributing to the growing dissatisfaction with the public school system. So, how can it be fixed?

For one, governments could give parents more choice. 

Alberta’s charter school model is an example worth copying. In that province, a number of publicly funded, non-profit schools cater to different educational priorities. There are schools that focus more on science and math, some that have a focus on fine arts, and even some based around Indigenous teachings. 

Best of all for parents, these schools do not charge tuition. Is it any surprise they have long waiting lists for enrollment? 

Expanding the number of these schools in Alberta, and introducing the idea to other provinces, can only be a good thing. Doing so would give parents more choice. For example, a parent with a child who’s passionate about the trades would certainly appreciate a school where they could dedicate more time to learning about carpentry, welding or plumbing instead of critical race theory and gender ideology. 

Governments could also consider charter schools for faith-based groups. This could help address situations where school content or activities are in direct conflict with religious worldviews. For example, there have been at least two cases in Canada this year where public school teachers berated Muslim students for not participating in pride events. If religious families aren’t welcome in public schools, charter schools could be a potential solution.

Even non-religious parents who disagree with controversial gender and racial agendas could benefit from a charter school that vows not to infuse these ideas into its curriculum. 

It’s clear that Canada’s public schools are heading in the wrong direction. While improving the public system itself is a goal worth pursuing, giving parents more choice is equally important. After all, parents should have the final say when it comes to raising their own children.

Dom Lucyk is the Communications Director with SecondStreet.org, a public policy think tank.

This column was published in True North on August 5, 2023.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

You can help us continue to research and tell stories about this issue by making a donation or sharing this content with your friends. Be sure to sign up for our updates too!

Prevention – reduce demand in the first place

If Canadians lived healthier lives, we could reduce demand for emergency services, orthopaedic surgeries, primary care and more. 

For instance, if you visit the Canadian Cancer Society’s website, you’ll read that “about four in ten” cancer cases are preventable. The Heart and Stroke Foundation notes that “almost 80 percent of premature heart disease and stroke can be prevented through healthy behaviours.” A similar number of Diabetes cases are also preventable. 

Many joint replacements and visits to ERs and walk-in clinics could also be avoided through healthy living. 

To be sure, not all health problems can be avoided through healthy living – everyday the system treats Canadians with genetic conditions, helps those injured in unavoidable accidents and more.  

But there is an opportunity to reduce pressure on the health care system through Canadians shifting to healthier lifestyles – better diets, more exercise, etc. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this column. 

Partner with non-profits and for-profit clinics

European countries will partner with anyone who can help patients. 

It doesn’t matter if it’s a non-profit, a government entity or a private clinic. What matters is that patients receive quality treatment, in a timely manner and for a competitive price.  

In Canada, governments often delivery services using government-run hospitals instead of seeing if non-profit or private clinics could deliver the services more effectively. 

When governments have partnered with non-profit and private clinics, the results have often been quite good – Saskatchewan, Ontario and British Columbia are just a few examples of where partnerships have worked well. 

Canada should pursue more of these partnerships to reduce wait times and increase the volume of services provided to patients.  

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see the links above. 

Make cross border care more accessible

In Canada, citizens pay high taxes each year and we’re promised universal health care services in return. The problem is, wait times are often extremely long in our health system – sometimes patients have to wait years to see a specialist or receive surgery. 

If patients don’t want to wait long periods, they often have to reach into their own pocket and pay for treatment outside the province or country. 

Throughout the European Union, we also find universal health care systems. But a key difference is that EU patients have the right to go to other EU countries, pay for surgery and then be reimbursed by their home government. Reimbursements cover up to what the patient’s home government would have spent to provide the treatment locally. 

If Canada copied this approach, a patient waiting a year to get their hip operation could instead receive treatment next week in one of thousands of surgical clinics throughout the developed world. 

Governments benefit too as the patient is now back on their feet and avoiding complications that sometimes come with long wait times – meaning the government doesn’t have to treat those complications on top of the initial health problem. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or this shorter video. 

Legalize access to non-government providers

Canada is the only country in the world that puts up barriers, or outright bans patients from paying for health services locally. 

For instance, a patient in Toronto cannot pay for a hip operation at a private clinic in Toronto. Their only option is to wait for the government to eventually provide treatment or leave the province and pay elsewhere. 

Countries with better-performing universal health care systems do not have such bans. They allow patients a choice – use the public system or pay privately for treatment. Sweden, France, Australia and more – they all allow choice. 

Why? One reason is that allowing choice means some patients will decide to pay privately. This takes pressure off the public system. For instance, in Sweden, 87% of patients use the public system, but 13% purchase private health insurance. 

Ultimately, more choice improves access for patients. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or watch this short clip on this topic. 

Shift to funding services for patients, not bureaucracies

In Canada, most hospitals receive a cheque from the government each year and are then asked to do their best to help patients. This approach is known as “block funding”. 

Under this model, a patient walking in the door represents a drain on the hospital’s budget. Over the course of a year, hospital administrators have to make sure the budget stretches out so services are rationed. This is why you might have to wait until next year or the year after for a hip operation, knee operation, etc. 

In better-performing universal health systems, they take the opposite approach – hospitals receive money from the government each time they help a patient. If a hospital completes a knee operation, it might receive, say, $10,000. If it completes a knee operation on another patient, it receives another $10,000. 

This model incentivizes hospitals to help more patients – to help more patients with knee operations, cataract surgery, etc. This approach also incentivizes hospitals to spend money on expenses that help patients (e.g. more doctors, nurses, equipment, etc.) rather than using the money on expenses that don’t help patients (e.g. more admin staff). 

To learn more about this policy option, please watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this post by MEI.