Read the Report

Read the Column

More Cool CO2 Innovation

co2 photo

In November 2021, SecondStreet.org released a policy brief that examined 25 innovative ways that entrepreneurs were reducing carbon dioxide or repurposing the gas to make useful products, such as vodka, diamonds, plastics and even blue food colouring. These were summarized in a policy brief written by James Skinner. 

Since then, we have continued to examine other examples of this kind of innovation. Here are some that were not covered in the original policy brief:

  • Protein Innovation – California-based Air Protein has been using recycled purified carbon dioxide to help make “air meat,” a product that resembles traditional beef, chicken, seafood or pork. The process does not produce any greenhouse gas emissions and occurs through air fermentation. The “air meat” only takes a few hours and the process resembles that of wine and cheese. Similarly, Running Tide has been producing healthy and low carbon protein. Through the use of software-controlled aquatic growth systems, Running Tide has been able to produce shellfish, such as oysters, along with microalgae. These forms of protein are able to absorb significant amounts of carbon dioxide before they make it to the dinner table. For example, 100kg of oysters can remove 12kg of CO2.
  • Carbon Capture for Semi-Trucks – Michigan-based Remora has created a device that is able to capture at least 80% of a semi-truck’s emissions directly from the tailpipe. Remora then takes the captured CO2 and sells it off to end users such as cement-making companies. Remora’s plan is to eventually sell credits for storing the CO2 underground. Although drivers must purchase the device, it pays for itself in the long run as Remora will split the revenue from CO2 sales with customers.
  • The Production of Sugars Hago Energetics has been working on ways to convert CO2 into glucose and other sugars. Their innovations would make it possible to produce sugars using resources available on Mars, and on Earth. This is done through the use of CO2 and waste. The company is also using captured CO2 to make ethanol, carbon black and activated carbon – materials which can be used to make a wide range of products, such as plastics, ink, tire fillers, water purification and more.
  • Bamboo Carbon SequestrationRhizome has been using bamboo as a building material, since it is an effective conduit for carbon sequestration. While a typical tree can only sequester one ton of carbon dioxide over 40 years, Bamboo is efficient in that it can sequester two tonnes of carbon in seven years. This resource is valuable in construction and engineering. Rhizome has been increasing the bamboo supply chain through their cultivation of the plant in subtropical Florida and the Philippines.  
  • Carbon Removal Marketplace – Washington-based Nori has created a carbon removal marketplace where companies are easily able to pay farmers to store carbon in their soil (to learn more – click here). This marketplace enables regenerative agriculture projects as forms of carbon removal.
  • Hemp Building ProductsHempitecture Inc., an Idaho-based company, produces hemp-derived building products that have the ability to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. From there, Hempitecture is able to solidify CO2 into fireproof insulation.
  • MechanicalTrees™ – The Centre for Negative Carbon Emissions, based out of Arizona State University, has been working on Mechanical Trees™ that are able to capture and release carbon dioxide. The captured carbon is able to then be converted into carbon neutral fuels or for disposal.

The examples outlined above are inspiring and demonstrate that while politicians continue to describe CO2 as “pollution,” entrepreneurs recognize that it’s a resource that can be repurposed to make products that consumers use each day. 

Selena Mercuri is a research intern with SecondStreet.org



Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

You can help us continue to research and tell stories about this issue by making a donation or sharing this content with your friends. Be sure to sign up for our updates too!

Prevention – reduce demand in the first place

If Canadians lived healthier lives, we could reduce demand for emergency services, orthopaedic surgeries, primary care and more. 

For instance, if you visit the Canadian Cancer Society’s website, you’ll read that “about four in ten” cancer cases are preventable. The Heart and Stroke Foundation notes that “almost 80 percent of premature heart disease and stroke can be prevented through healthy behaviours.” A similar number of Diabetes cases are also preventable. 

Many joint replacements and visits to ERs and walk-in clinics could also be avoided through healthy living. 

To be sure, not all health problems can be avoided through healthy living – everyday the system treats Canadians with genetic conditions, helps those injured in unavoidable accidents and more.  

But there is an opportunity to reduce pressure on the health care system through Canadians shifting to healthier lifestyles – better diets, more exercise, etc. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this column. 

Partner with non-profits and for-profit clinics

European countries will partner with anyone who can help patients. 

It doesn’t matter if it’s a non-profit, a government entity or a private clinic. What matters is that patients receive quality treatment, in a timely manner and for a competitive price.  

In Canada, governments often delivery services using government-run hospitals instead of seeing if non-profit or private clinics could deliver the services more effectively. 

When governments have partnered with non-profit and private clinics, the results have often been quite good – Saskatchewan, Ontario and British Columbia are just a few examples of where partnerships have worked well. 

Canada should pursue more of these partnerships to reduce wait times and increase the volume of services provided to patients.  

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see the links above. 

Make cross border care more accessible

In Canada, citizens pay high taxes each year and we’re promised universal health care services in return. The problem is, wait times are often extremely long in our health system – sometimes patients have to wait years to see a specialist or receive surgery. 

If patients don’t want to wait long periods, they often have to reach into their own pocket and pay for treatment outside the province or country. 

Throughout the European Union, we also find universal health care systems. But a key difference is that EU patients have the right to go to other EU countries, pay for surgery and then be reimbursed by their home government. Reimbursements cover up to what the patient’s home government would have spent to provide the treatment locally. 

If Canada copied this approach, a patient waiting a year to get their hip operation could instead receive treatment next week in one of thousands of surgical clinics throughout the developed world. 

Governments benefit too as the patient is now back on their feet and avoiding complications that sometimes come with long wait times – meaning the government doesn’t have to treat those complications on top of the initial health problem. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or this shorter video. 

Legalize access to non-government providers

Canada is the only country in the world that puts up barriers, or outright bans patients from paying for health services locally. 

For instance, a patient in Toronto cannot pay for a hip operation at a private clinic in Toronto. Their only option is to wait for the government to eventually provide treatment or leave the province and pay elsewhere. 

Countries with better-performing universal health care systems do not have such bans. They allow patients a choice – use the public system or pay privately for treatment. Sweden, France, Australia and more – they all allow choice. 

Why? One reason is that allowing choice means some patients will decide to pay privately. This takes pressure off the public system. For instance, in Sweden, 87% of patients use the public system, but 13% purchase private health insurance. 

Ultimately, more choice improves access for patients. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or watch this short clip on this topic. 

Shift to funding services for patients, not bureaucracies

In Canada, most hospitals receive a cheque from the government each year and are then asked to do their best to help patients. This approach is known as “block funding”. 

Under this model, a patient walking in the door represents a drain on the hospital’s budget. Over the course of a year, hospital administrators have to make sure the budget stretches out so services are rationed. This is why you might have to wait until next year or the year after for a hip operation, knee operation, etc. 

In better-performing universal health systems, they take the opposite approach – hospitals receive money from the government each time they help a patient. If a hospital completes a knee operation, it might receive, say, $10,000. If it completes a knee operation on another patient, it receives another $10,000. 

This model incentivizes hospitals to help more patients – to help more patients with knee operations, cataract surgery, etc. This approach also incentivizes hospitals to spend money on expenses that help patients (e.g. more doctors, nurses, equipment, etc.) rather than using the money on expenses that don’t help patients (e.g. more admin staff). 

To learn more about this policy option, please watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this post by MEI.