Column

Report

A Closer Look At Blood Plasma Donations in Canada

Play Video

The Alberta legislature will soon be debating a private member’s bill that would allow people to donate their blood plasma … and get paid for it.

This change is being debated as researchers have reported on the growing demand for blood products world-wide as well as global shortages.

As blood plasma plays an incredibly important role in society – from supporting patients with debilitating health issues to helping researchers develop a treatment for viruses such as COVID-19 – we decided to take a closer look at the issue.

What is Blood Plasma?

We’re all familiar with blood. It’s in all of us and most people know that if they have an accident and lose a significant amount of blood, they’re probably going toneed a blood transfusion.

But what about blood plasma?

Blood plasma is the straw-coloured part of blood that contains many proteins, including albumin, clotting factors, and antibodies, otherwise known as immunoglobulins. The antibodies help the body fight infections, while clotting factors help our blood to clot.

For example, in this clip, Kate van der Meer describes her condition (Multifocal Motor Neuropathy (MMN)) and explains how if she doesn’t receive regular infusions of intravenousimmunoglobulin, a blood plasma therapy, her condition could worsen and her mobility and well-being would be affected.

Kate’s condition is a neurological condition, and is one of a growing number of conditions for which plasma therapies are an effective treatment. These include helpingpatients with autoimmune and immunodeficiency disorders. Some therapies take plasma from patients with specific antibodies in order to create a therapy called a hyperimmune globulin. These include therapies against rabies and tetanus, and researchers are currently attempting tocreate just such a treatment against COVID-19.

A key difference between blood and blood plasma donations isthat while someone can make a regular blood donation every fifty-six days, a plasma donation can be done twice a week with at least 48 hours in-between.

Canadian Paid Plasma

Currently, there are three locations in Canada where people can get paid for donating their plasma: Canadian Plasma Resources has a plasma center in Saskatoon and Moncton, and Prometic Plasma Resources has a facility in Winnipeg.

However, the provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec have enacted bans on donors being paid for their plasma through provincial legislation. (These four provinces alone comprise more than 86%of Canada’s population)

The bans appear to be political in nature, rather than based on sound medical and scientific health policy. According to Health Canada, paid plasma is no less safe than unpaid plasma, and makes therapies that are equally effective.

As noted, the Alberta legislature will soon debate a new bill thatseeks to repeal the province’s Voluntary Blood Donations Act and allow Albertans to start receiving compensation for their blood plasma donations.

Paid Plasma Supply

As noted, most Canadians live in provinces that ban people from being paid for their plasma donations. This is one reason why Canadians don’t donate enough blood plasma to meet our nation’s demand. As a result, Canada currently imports 80% of our nation’s plasma therapies made from the plasma of paidAmerican donors. (As of 2020, the U.S. is responsible for 70% of the world’s blood plasma supply for plasma therapies.)

You read that right – while most Canadians are banned from being paid for plasma donations our health care system relies heavily on blood plasmCanadian Plasma Resourcesa that comes from Americans who are paid for their blood plasma donations.

Canada’s reliance on American blood plasma leaves our nation vulnerable in the event of a catastrophic health issue. Alternatively, if the United States were to limit exports, or if demand were to grow significantly, it would cause significant shortages in Canada and that would be dangerous for the patients who rely on plasma therapies for medical treatment.

Currently, demand for plasma therapies, especially immunoglobulin, is increasing at a rate of 6-10% per year. Experts expect that Canada will face serious shortages in the years ahead. Speaking before a Senate of Canada committee hearing in March, 2019, the CEO of Canadian Blood Services noted:

“The question then is not if we will see product shortages but when. It is not a question of if commercial prices will go up but by how much. The time to act is now to protect the critical supply for Canadian patients.”

Allowing Paid Donations

To reduce Canada’s reliance on paid American donors, and meet the growing demand, provincial governments that currently ban paid plasma should lift their bans. Doing so is likely to significantly increase blood plasma donations and help level the playing field between Canada and the U.S.

Further, our health care system could actually save money if paid donations were allowed in more provinces.

This is because blood plasma that comes from unpaid donations is estimated to be 2-4 times more expensive than paid blood plasma donations. For example, in 2017, Canadian Plasma Resources offered all of the Canadian plasma they collect to Canadian Blood Services for $166 per litre. In comparison, Canadian Blood Services has a plan to collect 600,000 litres of plasma at an annual, ongoing operating cost of $247 million dollars by 2024. This works out to $412 per litre, or more than twice as expensive. Similarly, one report estimated that if Australia were to import all of its plasma therapies from the countries that permit payment, it could save $200 million dollars (AUS $) annually.

On an individual basis, the $30 to $50 of compensation provided per donation could provide a little bit of extra income for Canadians – which would help low-income individuals pay rent, or a student purchases a couple of extra textbooks, as it does in the United States, Germany, and Austria.

Objections

According to Peter Jaworski, a Canadian professor of business ethics at Georgetown University, the most frequently cited argument against paid plasma surrounds the issue of safety. In Ontario and Alberta, those who supported a ban on paid plasma argued that we needed a ban because paid plasma was unsafe, and could lead to a repeat of the tainted blood scandal of the 1980s. But not only does Health Canada state that paid plasma is no less safe than unpaid plasma, this objection ignores the fact that we are already using paid plasma for most of our plasma therapies. If this were a genuine concern, opponents would argue against importing paid plasma too. But such arguments were never made.

Interesting Links

If you would like to learn more about this issue, the following resources might be of interest:

Letters penned by academics (including Nobel Prize winners) defending payment for blood plasma donations – https://donationethics.com/ 

Health Canada Expert Panel report on improving immune globulin supply – https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/expert-panel-immune-globulin-product-supply-related-impacts-canada/protecting-access-immune-globulins-canadians.html/

Professor Peter Jaworski’s full report on the issue – https://www.adamsmith.org/research/bloody-well-pay-them

By: Gage Haubrich, SecondStreet.org research intern

Kate van der Meer’s story

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

You can help us continue to research and tell stories about this issue by making a donation or sharing this content with your friends. Be sure to sign up for our updates too!

Prevention – reduce demand in the first place

If Canadians lived healthier lives, we could reduce demand for emergency services, orthopaedic surgeries, primary care and more. 

For instance, if you visit the Canadian Cancer Society’s website, you’ll read that “about four in ten” cancer cases are preventable. The Heart and Stroke Foundation notes that “almost 80 percent of premature heart disease and stroke can be prevented through healthy behaviours.” A similar number of Diabetes cases are also preventable. 

Many joint replacements and visits to ERs and walk-in clinics could also be avoided through healthy living. 

To be sure, not all health problems can be avoided through healthy living – everyday the system treats Canadians with genetic conditions, helps those injured in unavoidable accidents and more.  

But there is an opportunity to reduce pressure on the health care system through Canadians shifting to healthier lifestyles – better diets, more exercise, etc. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this column. 

Partner with non-profits and for-profit clinics

European countries will partner with anyone who can help patients. 

It doesn’t matter if it’s a non-profit, a government entity or a private clinic. What matters is that patients receive quality treatment, in a timely manner and for a competitive price.  

In Canada, governments often delivery services using government-run hospitals instead of seeing if non-profit or private clinics could deliver the services more effectively. 

When governments have partnered with non-profit and private clinics, the results have often been quite good – Saskatchewan, Ontario and British Columbia are just a few examples of where partnerships have worked well. 

Canada should pursue more of these partnerships to reduce wait times and increase the volume of services provided to patients.  

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see the links above. 

Make cross border care more accessible

In Canada, citizens pay high taxes each year and we’re promised universal health care services in return. The problem is, wait times are often extremely long in our health system – sometimes patients have to wait years to see a specialist or receive surgery. 

If patients don’t want to wait long periods, they often have to reach into their own pocket and pay for treatment outside the province or country. 

Throughout the European Union, we also find universal health care systems. But a key difference is that EU patients have the right to go to other EU countries, pay for surgery and then be reimbursed by their home government. Reimbursements cover up to what the patient’s home government would have spent to provide the treatment locally. 

If Canada copied this approach, a patient waiting a year to get their hip operation could instead receive treatment next week in one of thousands of surgical clinics throughout the developed world. 

Governments benefit too as the patient is now back on their feet and avoiding complications that sometimes come with long wait times – meaning the government doesn’t have to treat those complications on top of the initial health problem. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or this shorter video. 

Legalize access to non-government providers

Canada is the only country in the world that puts up barriers, or outright bans patients from paying for health services locally. 

For instance, a patient in Toronto cannot pay for a hip operation at a private clinic in Toronto. Their only option is to wait for the government to eventually provide treatment or leave the province and pay elsewhere. 

Countries with better-performing universal health care systems do not have such bans. They allow patients a choice – use the public system or pay privately for treatment. Sweden, France, Australia and more – they all allow choice. 

Why? One reason is that allowing choice means some patients will decide to pay privately. This takes pressure off the public system. For instance, in Sweden, 87% of patients use the public system, but 13% purchase private health insurance. 

Ultimately, more choice improves access for patients. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or watch this short clip on this topic. 

Shift to funding services for patients, not bureaucracies

In Canada, most hospitals receive a cheque from the government each year and are then asked to do their best to help patients. This approach is known as “block funding”. 

Under this model, a patient walking in the door represents a drain on the hospital’s budget. Over the course of a year, hospital administrators have to make sure the budget stretches out so services are rationed. This is why you might have to wait until next year or the year after for a hip operation, knee operation, etc. 

In better-performing universal health systems, they take the opposite approach – hospitals receive money from the government each time they help a patient. If a hospital completes a knee operation, it might receive, say, $10,000. If it completes a knee operation on another patient, it receives another $10,000. 

This model incentivizes hospitals to help more patients – to help more patients with knee operations, cataract surgery, etc. This approach also incentivizes hospitals to spend money on expenses that help patients (e.g. more doctors, nurses, equipment, etc.) rather than using the money on expenses that don’t help patients (e.g. more admin staff). 

To learn more about this policy option, please watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this post by MEI.