File a Health Care Complaint. Your story can help drive real change.

FINANCIAL POST COLUMN: Canada’s hospitals do poorly in online reviews

July 30, 2026

SecondStreet.org President Colin Craig and Research Director Bacchus Barua in the Financial Post.

Read in Financial Post

 

New research by SecondStreet.org found the average score of major hospitals in Canada for 2025 was just 2.88 stars (out of five). Yes, that’s right, many Canadians would take a pass on a restaurant with such a low score, but we often have no other choice when it comes to our hospitals. 

Thankfully, it doesn’t have to be this way. There are clear options to improve the health care services available for Canadians. More on that in a moment, but first, the findings:

Just like last year, analysis of nearly 9,000 comments left by patients reveals a nation that is frustrated by long wait times. This was by far the most common type of comment left – patients often noting they waited “eight hours,” “ten hours” and longer. One patient even said, “don’t bother coming to ER if you are conscious though…gave up after a 14 hour wait. Easier and faster to book a plane to South America/Europe and get treated there.” 

Seven Oaks General Hospital in Winnipeg was the lowest ranked hospital out of the 84 hospitals studied, earning less than two stars. One patient noted, “What a terrible place to go if you’re experiencing a medical emergency. I was so happy to be called after two hours, only to be put in a room for eight hours with no doctor checking on me … it needs to be shut down.”

Another said, “they are just chit chatting and we have been waiting inside for more than 10 hours with horrible pain.”

To be sure, not all the comments about this hospital, and others across the country, were negative. For instance, one user had this to say about Seven Oaks, “front information desk very helpful. Ultrasound department very kind and efficient.” Users sometimes remarked about other hospitals delivering “excellent” care. The problem in Canada is not that patients never have positive experiences with the health system, the problem is that far too often the experience is the opposite.

British Columbia hospitals had the highest average score among Canadian provinces, earning slightly over three stars. While it’s better than other provinces, a three-star rating (out of five) leaves a lot of room for improvement – and keep in mind that Google doesn’t allow users to leave a zero-star rating, 

One hospital in B.C., however, really stood out – Mount Saint Joseph Hospital in Vancouver. This provider once again earned the highest score in Canada – an impressive 4.25 stars. The Catholic hospital has been around for over a century and is now part of Providence Health Care, a non-profit provider. They were kind of enough to welcome our think tank for a visit this past March to learn more about the secret to their success.

One factor seems to be St. Joseph’s  independent nature – the hospital came together not because a government bureaucrat decided to recommend building a new hospital, but because nuns decided to establish a facility to help the city’s disadvantaged Chinese community. During the Aids crisis in the 1980s, the hospital again showed its dedication to helping patients, welcoming those with the virus while other facilities turned them away. Needless to say, this is a mission-driven organization – the drive to help patients is part of the hospital’s DNA.

We also heard again and again that staff are trained to focus on what patients are saying – do they want a bath today? What would help them feel better? Etc. This may sound like common sense, but many Google reviews from other hospitals describe frustration with staff not listening.

Staff at Mount Saint Joseph also said they felt listened to by their managers, creating an environment where staff feel empowered to improve services. Considering Mount Saint Joseph’s sister hospital, St. Paul’s, also was a top-ranked facility in Canada, it’s clear that Providence Health Care is onto something when it comes to providing quality care.

One solution to improve care in Canada would be for lower-performing hospitals in Canada to contact providers like Providence Health to learn more about what they’re doing right. Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto ­– the only other four star hospital in Canada – is another facility worth examining.

The other lesson here is the benefits that come from when governments partner with third parties. In this case, the government is still funding health care for patients, it’s just using a non-profit provider to deliver treatment. While this is true of many hospitals across Canada, the independent nature of St. Joseph’s Hospital clearly shapes its mission, informs the attitudes of its staff and caregivers, and has a demonstrable positive impact on the patients it serves.

While the precise nature of what separates the top-performing hospitals from the worst needs further investigation, one thing is clear, Google scores are another indicator that show Canadian patients – and even staff – are overwhelmingly frustrated with the status quo. Reform can’t come soon enough.

 

Colin Craig is the President of SecondStreet.org, a Canadian think tank and Bacchus Barua is the organization’s Research Director.

This column was originally published in The Financial Post on 30 July, 2026.

You can help us continue to research and tell stories about this issue by making a donation or sharing this content with your friends. Be sure to sign up for our updates too!

Share this Story

Help spread the message and make real change by sharing this story with your network.

Facebook
X
Email

How You Can Take Action

Whether you donate, speak up, or share our work, every action strengthens the push for better policies in health care, education, and everyday life. When Canadians get involved, leaders pay attention—and real reform becomes possible.

Related Stories

August 17, 2026
What's going on with property rights in Canada? Plus, is this high speed rail thing a good use of taxpayer dollars?
August 13, 2026
A new SecondStreet.org report shows that more nurses from Ontario are choosing to work in the U.S. than just a few years ago.
August 13, 2026
A new report from SecondStreet.org shows that more Ontario nurses are choosing to work in the U.S.

Join 20,000+ Canadians in our movement for a better Canada.

Name(Required)
Select Your Interests(Required)
Consent(Required)

Prevention – reduce demand in the first place

If Canadians lived healthier lives, we could reduce demand for emergency services, orthopaedic surgeries, primary care and more. 

For instance, if you visit the Canadian Cancer Society’s website, you’ll read that “about four in ten” cancer cases are preventable. The Heart and Stroke Foundation notes that “almost 80 percent of premature heart disease and stroke can be prevented through healthy behaviours.” A similar number of Diabetes cases are also preventable. 

Many joint replacements and visits to ERs and walk-in clinics could also be avoided through healthy living. 

To be sure, not all health problems can be avoided through healthy living – everyday the system treats Canadians with genetic conditions, helps those injured in unavoidable accidents and more.  

But there is an opportunity to reduce pressure on the health care system through Canadians shifting to healthier lifestyles – better diets, more exercise, etc. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this column. 

Partner with non-profits and for-profit clinics

European countries will partner with anyone who can help patients. 

It doesn’t matter if it’s a non-profit, a government entity or a private clinic. What matters is that patients receive quality treatment, in a timely manner and for a competitive price.  

In Canada, governments often delivery services using government-run hospitals instead of seeing if non-profit or private clinics could deliver the services more effectively. 

When governments have partnered with non-profit and private clinics, the results have often been quite good – Saskatchewan, Ontario and British Columbia are just a few examples of where partnerships have worked well. 

Canada should pursue more of these partnerships to reduce wait times and increase the volume of services provided to patients.  

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see the links above. 

Make cross border care more accessible

In Canada, citizens pay high taxes each year and we’re promised universal health care services in return. The problem is, wait times are often extremely long in our health system – sometimes patients have to wait years to see a specialist or receive surgery. 

If patients don’t want to wait long periods, they often have to reach into their own pocket and pay for treatment outside the province or country. 

Throughout the European Union, we also find universal health care systems. But a key difference is that EU patients have the right to go to other EU countries, pay for surgery and then be reimbursed by their home government. Reimbursements cover up to what the patient’s home government would have spent to provide the treatment locally. 

If Canada copied this approach, a patient waiting a year to get their hip operation could instead receive treatment next week in one of thousands of surgical clinics throughout the developed world. 

Governments benefit too as the patient is now back on their feet and avoiding complications that sometimes come with long wait times – meaning the government doesn’t have to treat those complications on top of the initial health problem. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or this shorter video. 

Legalize access to non-government providers

Canada is the only country in the world that puts up barriers, or outright bans patients from paying for health services locally. 

For instance, a patient in Toronto cannot pay for a hip operation at a private clinic in Toronto. Their only option is to wait for the government to eventually provide treatment or leave the province and pay elsewhere. 

Countries with better-performing universal health care systems do not have such bans. They allow patients a choice – use the public system or pay privately for treatment. Sweden, France, Australia and more – they all allow choice. 

Why? One reason is that allowing choice means some patients will decide to pay privately. This takes pressure off the public system. For instance, in Sweden, 87% of patients use the public system, but 13% purchase private health insurance. 

Ultimately, more choice improves access for patients. 

To learn more, watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or watch this short clip on this topic. 

Shift to funding services for patients, not bureaucracies

In Canada, most hospitals receive a cheque from the government each year and are then asked to do their best to help patients. This approach is known as “block funding”. 

Under this model, a patient walking in the door represents a drain on the hospital’s budget. Over the course of a year, hospital administrators have to make sure the budget stretches out so services are rationed. This is why you might have to wait until next year or the year after for a hip operation, knee operation, etc. 

In better-performing universal health systems, they take the opposite approach – hospitals receive money from the government each time they help a patient. If a hospital completes a knee operation, it might receive, say, $10,000. If it completes a knee operation on another patient, it receives another $10,000. 

This model incentivizes hospitals to help more patients – to help more patients with knee operations, cataract surgery, etc. This approach also incentivizes hospitals to spend money on expenses that help patients (e.g. more doctors, nurses, equipment, etc.) rather than using the money on expenses that don’t help patients (e.g. more admin staff). 

To learn more about this policy option, please watch our Health Reform Now documentary (scroll up) or see this post by MEI.